Reviews for "Structural Safety"

Journal title Average duration Review reports (1st review rnd.)
(click to go to journal page) 1st rev. rnd Tot. handling Im. rejection Number Quality Overall rating Outcome
Structural Safety 32.9 wks 33.0 wks n/a 2 5 (excellent) 5 (excellent) Accepted
Structural Safety 23.7 wks 23.9 wks n/a 2 5 (excellent) 5 (excellent) Accepted
Structural Safety 25.6 wks 37.7 wks n/a 2 5 (excellent) 5 (excellent) Accepted
Motivation: The review reports were candid and constructive. The quality of the manuscript definitely improved from the initial submission. It is worth the wait!
Structural Safety 43.3 wks 43.3 wks n/a 1 0 (very bad) 0 (very bad) Rejected
Motivation: After 10 months of review process they rejected the paper only with one reviewer comments and the reason was this :"conceptual novelty and thematic balance of the research published in the journal as well as the limitation in number of pages permitted yearly by the publisher"
They could reject within only a week by these reasons not 10 months.