Reviews for "PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases"

Journal title Average duration Review reports (1st review rnd.)
(click to go to journal page) 1st rev. rnd Tot. handling Im. rejection Number Quality Overall rating Outcome
PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases 4.7 wks n/a n/a 3 1 (bad) 0 (very bad) Rejected
Motivation: Absolutely unprofessional. The editor misplaced (I was not aware this was even possible) our manuscript and sent previous versions of the manuscript to the reviewers. The whole review process (the almost 8 months!) were confusing and the editors were not reachable at any point.
PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases 13.0 wks 13.0 wks n/a 0 n/a 4 (very good) Accepted
Motivation: The paper was accepted but it took several months for it to be published, otherwise I would have given a 5. Plos NTDs has very clear guidelines for and instructions that make the process very painless.