Reviews for "Philosophical Quarterly"

Journal title Average duration Review reports (1st review rnd.)
(click to go to journal page) 1st rev. rnd Tot. handling Im. rejection Number Quality Overall rating Outcome
Philosophical Quarterly 8.7 wks 8.7 wks n/a 1 4 (very good) 0 (very bad) Rejected
Motivation: While the referee was extremely positive, the editor decided to reject anyway (apparently the article was just not to her taste). This has happened a number of times for the journal and it makes me not want to referee for them - if the editor is going to make a decision that overturns that of the referee anyway, what's the point?
Philosophical Quarterly n/a n/a 20.0 days n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.)
Philosophical Quarterly 17.1 wks 24.7 wks n/a 2 3 (good) 3 (good) Rejected
Philosophical Quarterly 8.6 wks 8.6 wks n/a 1 5 (excellent) 5 (excellent) Rejected
Motivation: It didn't take long. The referee raised some important objections to my argument.
Philosophical Quarterly 3.3 wks 3.3 wks n/a 1 2 (moderate) 3 (good) Rejected
Philosophical Quarterly n/a n/a 10.0 days n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.)