|Journal title||Average duration||Review reports (1st review rnd.)|
|(click to go to journal page)||1st rev. rnd||Tot. handling||Im. rejection||Number||Quality||Overall rating||Outcome|
|Philosophical Psychology||13.0 wks||23.9 wks||n/a||3||4 (very good)||4 (very good)||Accepted|
|Motivation: - receiving the reviews after three months is okay, I think.
- some delays were caused by myself as it took me some time to improve my text.
- the reviews were good, most of them included very good comments and questions, the tone was citical but friendly.
- as far as I know, the text was reviewed by philosophers as well as by psychologists
|Philosophical Psychology||24.1 wks||44.4 wks||n/a||3||5 (excellent)||5 (excellent)||Accepted|
|Philosophical Psychology||30.4 wks||30.4 wks||n/a||2||4 (very good)||4 (very good)||Accepted|