Reviews for "Landscape and Urban Planning"

Journal title Average duration Review reports
(1st review rnd.)
(click to go to journal page) 1st rev. rnd Tot. handling Im. rejection Number Quality Overall rating Outcome
Landscape and Urban Planning 15.4
weeks
40.0
weeks
n/a 3 4
(very good)
2
(moderate)
Accepted
Motivation: After submitting the revised version in November 2013, we got contacted by the journal on 15-01-2014. The editor had noted that a large portion of reviewer 1's comments were excluded from the decicision letter of 31-08-2013. He attached the full comments of reviewer 1 and asked for a detailed response to these comments, as soon as possible.
We submitted the second revised version of the paper on 27-01-2014.
As such, due to the journal's mismanagement the whole proces lasted at least a few months more.

I couldn't specify this particular process in the questions above.
Landscape and Urban Planning 27.0
weeks
57.6
weeks
n/a 3 4
(very good)
3
(good)
Accepted
Landscape and Urban Planning n/a n/a 7.0
days
n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.)
Landscape and Urban Planning 17.4
weeks
17.4
weeks
n/a 3 2
(moderate)
0
(very bad)
Rejected
Landscape and Urban Planning 9.7
weeks
40.0
weeks
n/a 3 3
(good)
0
(very bad)
Accepted