Reviews for "Coral Reefs"

Journal title Average duration Review reports (1st review rnd.)
(click to go to journal page) 1st rev. rnd Tot. handling Im. rejection Number Quality Overall rating Outcome
Coral Reefs n/a n/a 4.0 days n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.)
Motivation: Quick decision.
Coral Reefs 3.6 wks 3.7 wks n/a 2 4 (very good) 5 (excellent) Accepted
Motivation: The process was quite fast.
Coral Reefs 8.4 wks 8.4 wks n/a 2 4 (very good) 3 (good) Rejected
Motivation: The duration of the review process is reasonable.
Reviewers' comments are comprehensive, with constructive suggestions.
Coral Reefs 25.6 wks 31.4 wks n/a 2 4 (very good) 4 (very good) Accepted
Motivation: The first round of review took far too long.
However, reviewers gave really constructive comments, which helped to improve the manuscript a lot.
Coral Reefs 7.6 wks 19.4 wks n/a 2 2 (moderate) 0 (very bad) Rejected
Motivation: The editor and reviewer argued that if the revisions did clarified several issues and resulted in a much clearer manuscript, however, they did had serious concerns regarding the novelty of this study relative to the previous one by two of the authors ".
I found such comments inappropriate after a third revision of the manuscript.