Reviews for "Computers, Environment and Urban Systems"

Journal title Average duration Review reports
(1st review rnd.)
(click to go to journal page) 1st rev. rnd Tot. handling Im. rejection Number Quality Overall rating Outcome
Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 10.0
weeks
13.7
weeks
n/a 2 4
(very good)
5
(excellent)
Accepted
Motivation: Very good and efficient process. The reviews were helpful and timely, and they have improved the paper.
Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 24.1
weeks
56.4
weeks
n/a 2 4
(very good)
3
(good)
Accepted
Motivation: Most of the reviews were useful and they have improved the paper, but the process of receiving the reviews and the decision was inexcusably slow. Communication with the editor could have been better, and the editor could have been more engaged in the process. One reviewer had unreasonable comments, and we feel that the editor should have stepped in after our rebuttal. This has considerably delayed the publication for no reason. After acceptance, typesetting by Elsevier induced some errors and it was also slow. CEUS is a good journal, but our experience with this paper was bad.
Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 12.4
weeks
12.4
weeks
n/a 3 3
(good)
3
(good)
Rejected
Motivation: Two reviewers either did not understand the paper or were intentionally blocking it.
Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 13.0
weeks
14.0
weeks
n/a 3 4
(very good)
4
(very good)
Accepted