Reviews for "Appetite"

Journal title Average duration Review reports (1st review rnd.)
(click to go to journal page) 1st rev. rnd Tot. handling Im. rejection Number Quality Overall rating Outcome
Appetite 4.0 wks 4.0 wks n/a 2 0 (very bad) 1 (bad) Rejected
Motivation: The editor agreed "with both reviewers that [what we pointed out] only hold for this paper but for many more" but stated that "It seems unfair to specifically target this issue for this paper". When we proposed to write a more general letter to the Editor addressing this common error, the Editor dismissed it as falling "beyond the scope of Appetite". I believe this shows lack of interest for the integrity of the Scientific Method.
Appetite 7.6 wks 22.7 wks n/a 2 4 (very good) 5 (excellent) Accepted