Reviews for "Acta Sociologica"

Journal title Average duration Review reports (1st review rnd.)
(click to go to journal page) 1st rev. rnd Tot. handling Im. rejection Number Quality Overall rating Outcome
Acta Sociologica 8.0 wks 22.7 wks n/a 3 4 (very good) 5 (excellent) Accepted
Motivation: Pretty good experience overall.
Acta Sociologica 12.4 wks n/a n/a 2 2 (moderate) 4 (very good) Rejected
Motivation: One review was thorough and helpful.

The other was a "you did not use my favorite theories" complaint, with little demonstration that my article was actually read.
Acta Sociologica 25.4 wks 33.6 wks n/a 3 4 (very good) 4 (very good) Accepted
Motivation: The reviews were of a high quality, after the reviews were received the communication with the journal was very constructive and the final decision was made relatively fast.
Acta Sociologica 26.0 wks 29.0 wks n/a 3 5 (excellent) 4 (very good) Accepted
Motivation: The comments of the reviewers were actually great (very appropriatly selected by the editor). They helped to improve the paper considerably. Also both editors give a lot of suggestions and comments in each round. Only drawback is the long period.
Acta Sociologica 26.0 wks n/a n/a 2 1 (bad) 1 (bad) Rejected