All reviews received by SciRev

Journal title Average duration Review reports (1st review rnd.)
(click to go to journal page) 1st rev. rnd Tot. handling Im. rejection Number Quality Overall rating Outcome
New Journal of Chemistry 6.0 wks 12.0 wks n/a 3 4 (very good) 5 (excellent) Accepted
Motivation: Thats a great reviewing method if you send the revised manuscripts (with major revision) to the original reviewers.
Analytical Methods 4.0 wks 6.0 wks n/a 3 3 (good) 5 (excellent) Accepted
Motivation: Analytical Methods has a great reviewing system. I am happy to publish a paper in this journal.
Chiang Mai Journal of Science 4.0 wks 6.0 wks n/a 3 4 (very good) 4 (very good) Accepted
Motivation: Chiang Mai Journal of Science has a good reviewing system. However, they take a long time in online publishing of their papers.
Chemico-Biological Interactions 6.0 wks 8.0 wks n/a 3 4 (very good) 5 (excellent) Accepted
Motivation: NA
RSC Advances 5.0 wks 7.0 wks n/a 3 4 (very good) 5 (excellent) Accepted
Motivation: RSC Advances and in general all RSC journals have quite good reviewing policies. I always look for publishing papers in RSC journals.
European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 4.0 wks 6.0 wks n/a 2 5 (excellent) 5 (excellent) Accepted
Motivation: It was a good experience to work with Prof. Herve Galons (Chief Editor, European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry).
New Journal of Chemistry 5.0 wks 7.0 wks n/a 2 4 (very good) 5 (excellent) Accepted
Motivation: It was a fair encounter to work with RSC publications.
Journal of Coordination Chemistry 5.0 wks 8.0 wks n/a 2 3 (good) 5 (excellent) Accepted
Journal of Coordination Chemistry 6.0 wks 9.0 wks n/a 2 3 (good) 5 (excellent) Accepted
Motivation: It was a nice experience of working with Jim Atwood, Editor of Journal of Coordination Chemistry.
RSC Advances 4.0 wks 6.0 wks n/a 2 4 (very good) 5 (excellent) Accepted
Motivation: RSC Advances ensures a speedy publication of the articles submitted to it.
Chemical Papers 6.0 wks 9.0 wks n/a 2 4 (very good) 5 (excellent) Accepted
Motivation: Chemical Papers ensured fast publication of my research paper.
Future Medicinal Chemistry 6.0 wks 9.0 wks n/a 2 4 (very good) 4 (very good) Accepted
Motivation: Medicinal Chemistry took a bit more time in publishing my final web version of the article.
Future Medicinal Chemistry 4.0 wks 6.0 wks n/a 3 3 (good) 5 (excellent) Accepted
Motivation: Future Medicinal Chemistry served as a perfect platform for the publication of my article.
Polyhedron 4.0 wks 4.1 wks n/a 2 4 (very good) 5 (excellent) Accepted
Motivation: My revised manuscript was accepted for publication just in a single day's time. The publication process of this journal is awesome.
Medicinal Chemistry 6.0 wks 8.0 wks n/a 2 4 (very good) 5 (excellent) Accepted
Motivation: NA
Biomedical Chromatography 3.0 wks 3.4 wks n/a 2 5 (excellent) 5 (excellent) Accepted
Motivation: Biomedical Chromatography of Wiley ensured a very rapid publication of our paper.
Microbial Pathogenesis 8.0 wks 10.0 wks n/a 2 4 (very good) 5 (excellent) Accepted
Motivation: NA
Journal of Liquid Chromatography and Related Technologies 8.0 wks 10.0 wks n/a 2 4 (very good) 5 (excellent) Accepted
Motivation: NA
Journal of Hydro-Environment Research 30.4 wks 32.4 wks n/a 1 4 (very good) 2 (moderate) Accepted
Journal of Public Economic Theory 30.4 wks 30.4 wks n/a 1 1 (bad) 0 (very bad) Rejected
Motivation: The process took way too long with as an output a terse and vague reviewers' report, a standard rejection letter, and 7 months of times wasted.
European Journal of Pharmacology 5.0 wks 7.0 wks n/a 3 3 (good) 3 (good) Accepted
Motivation: The acceptance to online publication was fast. The editor was very supportive.
Social Science Research 15.3 wks 36.7 wks n/a 2 2 (moderate) 3 (good) Accepted
Motivation: The handling of the manuscript was highly standardized with almost no communication from the editor (as you would expect at such a large journal). One reviewer did a good job, the other not but was muted by the editor during the process.
Sociological Science n/a n/a 7.0 days n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.)
Motivation: The manuscript was rejected based on one excellent review within a week.
Calculus of Variations and Partial Differential Equations 26.0 wks 34.7 wks n/a 1 1 (bad) 1 (bad) Accepted
Journal of Materials Science 7.7 wks 13.1 wks n/a 2 3 (good) 4 (very good) Accepted
Motivation: The review process itself was satisfactory. The only weak point was the quality of the reviewers' reports. I understand, however, that choosing the right reviewer for a given work can be a difficult task.
International Journal of Social Research Methodology 10.0 wks 10.0 wks n/a 3 4 (very good) 4 (very good) Accepted
Motivation: The editors took care to inform about the process, e.g. when the paper had been sent out to reviewers and the expected time frame. The editors also provided helpful comments in how to address the reviewers' comments so as to keep in line with the purposes of the journal.
Plant Biotechnology Journal 6.5 wks 8.7 wks n/a 2 4 (very good) 4 (very good) Accepted
Motivation: I felt like the editor and reviewers provided me wit useable feedback that helped me to improve the accessibility of the paper to a broader audience.
Journal of Sports Science and Medicine 8.7 wks 10.7 wks n/a 1 4 (very good) 4 (very good) Accepted
Classical and Quantum Gravity 8.7 wks 13.0 wks n/a 2 3 (good) 2 (moderate) Accepted
American Journal of Pathology 8.7 wks 12.7 wks n/a 3 5 (excellent) 5 (excellent) Accepted
Geofluids 8.7 wks 10.7 wks n/a 3 3 (good) 4 (very good) Accepted
Stem Cells 5.0 wks 7.0 wks n/a 2 4 (very good) 4 (very good) Accepted
Nature Communications n/a n/a 7.0 days n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.)
Journal of Neuroscience 4.0 wks 8.3 wks n/a 2 3 (good) 2 (moderate) Rejected
Headache 7.3 wks 10.4 wks n/a 1 3 (good) 3 (good) Accepted
Neurological Sciences 8.3 wks 9.3 wks n/a 2 3 (good) 3 (good) Accepted
Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology 7.9 wks 9.9 wks n/a 1 3 (good) 3 (good) Accepted
Physical Review Letters 2.0 wks 3.0 wks n/a 2 5 (excellent) 5 (excellent) Accepted
Journal of Pragmatics 13.9 wks 14.1 wks n/a 2 4 (very good) 5 (excellent) Accepted
Motivation: It's efficient.
Current Biology 0.6 wks 6.7 wks n/a 3 4 (very good) 5 (excellent) Accepted
Motivation: Lots of back and forth with the Reviewers through the Editor, which made for quick assessment of key sticking points. Presubmission systems saves a lot of time.