All reviews received by SciRev

Journal title Average duration Review reports (1st review rnd.)
(click to go to journal page) 1st rev. rnd Tot. handling Im. rejection Number Quality Overall rating Outcome
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 3.1 wks 3.1 wks n/a 2 1 (bad) 1 (bad) Rejected
Advanced Synthesis and Catalysis 9.6 wks 10.6 wks n/a 4 5 (excellent) 5 (excellent) Accepted
Coordination Chemistry Reviews 8.4 wks 10.6 wks n/a 2 5 (excellent) 5 (excellent) Accepted
Advanced Synthesis and Catalysis 2.7 wks 3.1 wks n/a 2 5 (excellent) 5 (excellent) Accepted
Chemical Reviews 4.4 wks 7.3 wks n/a 3 5 (excellent) 5 (excellent) Accepted
Tetrahedron 7.6 wks 9.3 wks n/a 2 5 (excellent) 5 (excellent) Accepted
FASEB Journal n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 4 (very good) Accepted (im.)
Infection and Immunity 8.7 wks 11.7 wks n/a 3 4 (very good) 4 (very good) Accepted
Cellular Microbiology 4.3 wks 8.3 wks n/a 4 4 (very good) 4 (very good) Accepted
Chemical Reviews 7.6 wks 8.1 wks n/a 5 5 (excellent) 5 (excellent) Accepted
Trends in Microbiology 5.0 wks 9.0 wks n/a 4 4 (very good) 4 (very good) Accepted
Journal of Immunology 5.0 wks 10.0 wks n/a 3 5 (excellent) 4 (very good) Accepted
FASEB Journal 4.0 wks 11.0 wks n/a 4 3 (good) 3 (good) Rejected
Neuropsychologia 7.9 wks 10.1 wks n/a 2 3 (good) 4 (very good) Accepted
Motivation: The first reviews had not exactly grasped the subject of my paper, whereas this was more correctly appreciated after reading the revised version and the responses to the reviewers.
Neuropsychologia 3.7 wks 4.1 wks n/a 2 4 (very good) 4 (very good) Accepted
Motivation: Some methodological aspects of the study were not correct and the reviewers' suggestions were very useful
Clinical Infectious Diseases 6.0 wks 8.0 wks n/a 2 5 (excellent) 5 (excellent) Accepted
Motivation: No additional comments. .
Water Research 13.0 wks 14.0 wks n/a 3 5 (excellent) 4 (very good) Accepted
Water Research 13.0 wks 13.6 wks n/a 3 4 (very good) 4 (very good) Accepted
Geobiology 6.7 wks 16.4 wks n/a 3 4 (very good) 3 (good) Accepted
Journal of Physical Chemistry, C 4.3 wks 4.6 wks n/a 3 4 (very good) 4 (very good) Accepted
International Journal of Engineering Science 16.1 wks 16.6 wks n/a 1 5 (excellent) 5 (excellent) Accepted
Tetrahedron 13.3 wks 14.3 wks n/a 1 5 (excellent) 5 (excellent) Accepted
Current Organic Chemistry 13.4 wks 14.4 wks n/a 2 4 (very good) 3 (good) Accepted
European Journal of Immunology 5.9 wks 10.3 wks n/a 2 3 (good) 4 (very good) Accepted
Tetrahedron Letters 8.7 wks 10.7 wks n/a 3 3 (good) 4 (very good) Accepted
Motivation: The review process was fast and I have no complaints.
Journal of Geochemical Exploration 6.0 wks 6.0 wks n/a 2 4 (very good) 4 (very good) Accepted
Motivation: The reviewers of this journal were quite fast and also they were expert enough to analyse the quality of my paper
Soft Matter 5.0 wks 10.0 wks n/a 2 4 (very good) 3 (good) Accepted
Acta Geophysica 13.0 wks 14.0 wks n/a 2 4 (very good) 5 (excellent) Accepted
Acta Poloniae Pharmaceutica 13.0 wks 13.0 wks n/a 2 4 (very good) 4 (very good) Accepted
Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials 8.1 wks 9.1 wks n/a 1 4 (very good) 5 (excellent) Accepted
PLoS ONE 13.0 wks 17.4 wks n/a 3 4 (very good) 4 (very good) Accepted
Demography 45.0 wks 45.0 wks n/a 2 3 (good) 1 (bad) Rejected
Astronomy Letters 3.3 wks 3.7 wks n/a 2 4 (very good) 4 (very good) Accepted
Motivation: The review process was almost excellent except sometimes I had to activate the referees and inform them about the most recent advances in the field.
Social Indicators Research 13.0 wks 17.4 wks n/a 2 4 (very good) 4 (very good) Accepted
Journal of Public Health 4.6 wks 4.6 wks n/a 2 5 (excellent) 5 (excellent) Accepted
International Mathematics Research Notices 8.7 wks 13.0 wks n/a 2 5 (excellent) 5 (excellent) Accepted
Motivation: Our manuscript was handled within 3 months which in my experience is quite fast.
Transport in Porous Media 75.1 wks 75.1 wks n/a 3 5 (excellent) 5 (excellent) Accepted
International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease 4.3 wks 5.3 wks n/a 2 4 (very good) 5 (excellent) Accepted
Motivation: The turn-around time was fast, the reviewers' comments were relevant and useful, and the communication with the journal editor was clear.
Molecules 2.0 wks 2.0 wks n/a 2 5 (excellent) 5 (excellent) Accepted
Journal of Philosophy of Education 52.1 wks 121.5 wks n/a 2 2 (moderate) 0 (very bad) Accepted
Motivation: Extremely slow process. We had to write to the editor several times to ask what happened to the manuscript and why we did not hear anything after 6 of 10 months of complete silence.