Review this journal

Scientific Reports

SciRev ratings (provided by authors) (based on 30 reviews)

Duration of manuscript handling phases Click to compare
Duration first review round 1.8 mnths compare →
Total handling time accepted manuscripts 3.7 mnths compare →
Decision time immediate rejection 24 days compare →
Characteristics of peer review process Click to compare
Average number of review reports 1.9 compare →
Average number of review rounds 1.9 compare →
Quality of review reports 3.1 compare →
Difficulty of reviewer comments 3.0 compare →
Overall rating manuscript handling 2.5 (range 0-5) compare →

Latest review Show all reviews

First review round: 5.1 weeks. Overall rating: 5 (excellent). Outcome: Accepted.

Motivation:
Overall review process was fair. Reviewers were also fair and asked nice questions, this helped us to improve our manuscript quality. Please remember Scientific Reports is Nature's journal and so, the manuscript has to follow the natures formatting standards. People complained about the quality check takes time and it does, if manuscript is not properly formatted. You avoid it by submitting proper formatted manuscript in first submission only.

Show all »

Journal info (provided by editor)

The editor of Scientific Reports has not yet provided information for this page.

Space for journal cover image
Issues per year
n/a
Articles published last year
n/a
Manuscripts received last year
n/a
% accepted last year
n/a
% immediately rejected last year
n/a
Open access status
n/a
Manuscript handling fee?
n/a
Kind of complaint procedure
n/a
Two-year impact factor
n/a
Five-year impact factor
n/a
Disciplines: General

Aims and scope

The editor has not yet provided this information.