Review this journal

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

SciRev ratings (provided by authors) (based on 30 reviews)

Duration of manuscript handling phases Click to compare
Duration first review round 1.8 mnths compare →
Total handling time accepted manuscripts 2.7 mnths compare →
Decision time immediate rejection 16 days compare →
Characteristics of peer review process Click to compare
Average number of review reports 2.1 compare →
Average number of review rounds 1.5 compare →
Quality of review reports 3.5 compare →
Difficulty of reviewer comments 4.0 compare →
Overall rating manuscript handling 3.3 (range 0-5) compare →

Latest review Show all reviews

Outcome: Rejected (im.).

Motivation:
It took some time to the editor to look into the manuscript and take a decision. It was expected to get a rejection from PNAS not because the work is not novel rather it was hard to find a suitable editor from the list of NAS members available on their website (who can be a right fit to review the work). Therefore, we suggested the names of few people to act as guest editor, however we think that they did not consider our request.

Show all »

Journal info (provided by editor)

The editor of Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America has not yet provided information for this page.

Space for journal cover image
Issues per year
n/a
Articles published last year
n/a
Manuscripts received last year
n/a
% accepted last year
n/a
% immediately rejected last year
n/a
Open access status
n/a
Manuscript handling fee?
n/a
Kind of complaint procedure
n/a
Two-year impact factor
n/a
Five-year impact factor
n/a
Disciplines: General

Aims and scope

The editor has not yet provided this information.