SciRev ratings (provided by authors) (based on 76 reviews)

Duration of manuscript handling phases Click to compare
Duration first review round 2.5 mnths compare →
Total handling time accepted manuscripts 3.7 mnths compare →
Decision time immediate rejection 18 days compare →
Characteristics of peer review process Click to compare
Average number of review reports 2.0 compare →
Average number of review rounds 1.9 compare →
Quality of review reports 3.2 compare →
Difficulty of reviewer comments 2.8 compare →
Overall rating manuscript handling 2.9 (range 0-5) compare →

Latest review Show all reviews

First review round: 8.4 weeks. Overall rating: 0 (very bad). Outcome: Rejected.

Motivation:
The reviewers in my opinion did not even try to understand the concept of the study. The authors tried their best. Added more explanations where ever asked. But the reviewers made lame reviews in the end targeting english proficiency of the first author. The first author is a native english speaker. The manuscript was still sent to a language expert and they found the english absolutely fine. After wasting approximately 4 months the journal rejected the paper without giving detailed reasons. Therefore to conclude, they could neither find competent reviewers and neither helped the authors when the reviewers were not doing a satisfactory job. Pathetic experience!

Show all »

Journal info (provided by editor)

The editor of PLoS ONE has not yet provided information for this page.

Space for journal cover image
Issues per year
n/a
Articles published last year
n/a
Manuscripts received last year
n/a
% accepted last year
n/a
% immediately rejected last year
n/a
Open access status
n/a
Manuscript handling fee?
n/a
Kind of complaint procedure
n/a
Two-year impact factor
n/a
Five-year impact factor
n/a
Disciplines: General, Medicine

Aims and scope

The editor has not yet provided this information.