Review this journal

Novum Testamentum

SciRev ratings (provided by authors) (based on 6 reviews)

Duration of manuscript handling phases Click to compare
Duration first review round 3.8 mnths compare →
Total handling time accepted manuscripts 3.8 mnths compare →
Decision time immediate rejection n/a compare →
Characteristics of peer review process Click to compare
Average number of review reports 0.0 compare →
Average number of review rounds 1.0 compare →
Quality of review reports n/a compare →
Difficulty of reviewer comments n/a compare →
Overall rating manuscript handling 2.2 (range 0-5) compare →

Latest review Show all reviews

First review round: 11.3 weeks. Overall rating: 0 (very bad). Outcome: Rejected.

The journal provided me with no external review and gave no specific reasons for rejecting my manuscripts. I suspect that what I received was a generic paragraph sent to all the author whose article suffered the same fate as mine: 'I regret to inform you that the editorial board did not accept your manuscript for publication in Novum Testamentum. I wish you all the best in your academic endeavours. Thank you for having considered Novum Testamentum for publication of your research. Yours sincerely,'

Show all »

Journal info (provided by editor)

The editor of Novum Testamentum has not yet provided information for this page.

Space for journal cover image
Issues per year
Articles published last year
Manuscripts received last year
% accepted last year
% immediately rejected last year
Open access status
Manuscript handling fee?
Kind of complaint procedure
Two-year impact factor
Five-year impact factor

Aims and scope

The editor has not yet provided this information.