Review this journal

Novum Testamentum

SciRev ratings (provided by authors) (based on 6 reviews)

Duration of manuscript handling phases Click to compare
Duration first review round 3.8 mnths compare →
Total handling time accepted manuscripts 3.8 mnths compare →
Decision time immediate rejection n/a compare →
Characteristics of peer review process Click to compare
Average number of review reports 0.0 compare →
Average number of review rounds 1.0 compare →
Quality of review reports n/a compare →
Difficulty of reviewer comments n/a compare →
Overall rating manuscript handling 2.2 (range 0-5) compare →

Latest review Show all reviews

First review round: 11.3 weeks. Overall rating: 0 (very bad). Outcome: Rejected.

Motivation:
The journal provided me with no external review and gave no specific reasons for rejecting my manuscripts. I suspect that what I received was a generic paragraph sent to all the author whose article suffered the same fate as mine: 'I regret to inform you that the editorial board did not accept your manuscript for publication in Novum Testamentum. I wish you all the best in your academic endeavours. Thank you for having considered Novum Testamentum for publication of your research. Yours sincerely,'

Show all »

Journal info (provided by editor)

The editor of Novum Testamentum has not yet provided information for this page.

Space for journal cover image
Issues per year
n/a
Articles published last year
n/a
Manuscripts received last year
n/a
% accepted last year
n/a
% immediately rejected last year
n/a
Open access status
n/a
Manuscript handling fee?
n/a
Kind of complaint procedure
n/a
Two-year impact factor
n/a
Five-year impact factor
n/a

Aims and scope

The editor has not yet provided this information.