Review this journal

Mindfulness

SciRev ratings (provided by authors) (based on 2 reviews)

Duration of manuscript handling phases Click to compare
Duration first review round 2.0 mnths compare →
Total handling time accepted manuscripts 3.0 mnths compare →
Decision time immediate rejection n/a compare →
Characteristics of peer review process Click to compare
Average number of review reports 3.0 compare →
Average number of review rounds 2.5 compare →
Quality of review reports 3.5 compare →
Difficulty of reviewer comments 4.0 compare →
Overall rating manuscript handling 4.5 (range 0-5) compare →

Latest review Show all reviews

First review round: 9.9 weeks. Overall rating: 5 (excellent). Outcome: Accepted.

Motivation:
Two reviewers expressed some doubts but were essentially encouraging. One review was so obnoxious as to prompt a query to the Editor on how to respond to such a discourteous and unprofessional review (s/he used terms like "ignorant", "naïve", "ridiculous", "self-serving" to describe us/our work!). The editor was extremely helpful and responsive in helping us to manage this difficult review. Overall I felt the Ed was not slavishly bound to reviewer recommendations and had sufficient flexibility and knowledge of the field to make a reasoned and rapid decision on our paper.

Show all »

Journal info (provided by editor)

The editor of Mindfulness has not yet provided information for this page.

Space for journal cover image
Issues per year
n/a
Articles published last year
n/a
Manuscripts received last year
n/a
% accepted last year
n/a
% immediately rejected last year
n/a
Open access status
n/a
Manuscript handling fee?
n/a
Kind of complaint procedure
n/a
Two-year impact factor
n/a
Five-year impact factor
n/a
Disciplines: Psychology

Aims and scope

The editor has not yet provided this information.