Review this journal

Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery

SciRev ratings (provided by authors) (based on 3 reviews)

Duration of manuscript handling phases Click to compare
Duration first review round 0.8 mnths compare →
Total handling time accepted manuscripts 1.4 mnths compare →
Decision time immediate rejection n/a compare →
Characteristics of peer review process Click to compare
Average number of review reports 2.7 compare →
Average number of review rounds 2.0 compare →
Quality of review reports 4.3 compare →
Difficulty of reviewer comments 3.0 compare →
Overall rating manuscript handling 4.3 (range 0-5) compare →

Latest review Show all reviews

First review round: 3.1 weeks. Overall rating: 4 (very good). Outcome: Accepted.

Motivation:
The review process was constructive, effective and fast.

Show all »

Journal info (provided by editor)

Issues per year
8
Articles published last year
133
Manuscripts received last year
410
% accepted last year
26
% immediately rejected last year
50
Open access status
optional
Manuscript handling fee?
no
Kind of complaint procedure
Editorial board
Two-year impact factor
2.19
Five-year impact factor
2.20

About

Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery publishes the best results in the field of clinical surgery and basic surgical research. The focus is on the highest level of clinical research and clinically relevant basic research. Published exclusively in English, the journal offers an international discussion forum for controlled results of clinical surgery. Most contributions are original articles that report clinical data from visceral, vascular and thoracic surgery, as well as traumatology, endocrine and transplantation surgery.

It is our goal to make an editorial decision on your manuscript within 24 hours after it is "with editor"!
Time from submission to first decision was 23 days in 2016!