Review this journal

Europe-Asia Studies

SciRev ratings (provided by authors) (based on 5 reviews)

Duration of manuscript handling phases Click to compare
Duration first review round 8.5 mnths compare →
Total handling time accepted manuscripts 8.5 mnths compare →
Decision time immediate rejection n/a compare →
Characteristics of peer review process Click to compare
Average number of review reports 2.0 compare →
Average number of review rounds 1.0 compare →
Quality of review reports 1.3 compare →
Difficulty of reviewer comments n/a compare →
Overall rating manuscript handling 0.8 (range 0-5) compare →

Latest review Show all reviews

First review round: 33.9 weeks. Overall rating: 1 (bad). Outcome: Rejected.

Motivation:
A very long review process. I received a very strange report that contained an "amalgamation" of two reviews, as it was explained by the editor. It was impossible to judge whether one, two or three persons wrote the review report. The review report itself was very angry and provided no help. Non-transparent reviewing. I will not submit a new paper until the current editorial team will be changed by new editors.

Show all »

Journal info (provided by editor)

The editor of Europe-Asia Studies has not yet provided information for this page.

Space for journal cover image
Issues per year
n/a
Articles published last year
n/a
Manuscripts received last year
n/a
% accepted last year
n/a
% immediately rejected last year
n/a
Open access status
n/a
Manuscript handling fee?
n/a
Kind of complaint procedure
n/a
Two-year impact factor
n/a
Five-year impact factor
n/a

Aims and scope

The editor has not yet provided this information.