Review this journal

Central European Journal of Public Policy

SciRev ratings (provided by authors) (based on 2 reviews)

Duration of manuscript handling phases Click to compare
Duration first review round 2.4 mnths compare →
Total handling time accepted manuscripts 2.8 mnths compare →
Decision time immediate rejection n/a compare →
Characteristics of peer review process Click to compare
Average number of review reports 2.0 compare →
Average number of review rounds 2.0 compare →
Quality of review reports 4.5 compare →
Difficulty of reviewer comments 3.5 compare →
Overall rating manuscript handling 4.5 (range 0-5) compare →

Latest review Show all reviews

First review round: 4.7 weeks. Overall rating: 4 (very good). Outcome: Accepted.

Motivation:
In overall it was quite good collaboration. The communication between author and editor was on time, no delays in answers. The reviews were helpful and constructive. The manuscript submission system was very helpful in order to provide the account for the funding institution.

Show all »

Journal info (provided by editor)

Issues per year
2
Articles published last year
16
Manuscripts received last year
n/a
% accepted last year
n/a
% immediately rejected last year
n/a
Open access status
open access
Manuscript handling fee?
no
Kind of complaint procedure
Editorial board

Aims and Scope

The Central European Journal of Public Policy (CEJPP) is an open-access, multidisciplinary, peer-reviewed journal with primary focus upon analytical, theoretical and methodological articles in the field of public policy.
The aim of the CEJPP is to provide academic scholars and professionals in different policy fields with the latest theoretical and methodological advancements in public policy supported by sound empirical research. The CEJPP addresses all topics of public policy including social services and healthcare, environmental protection, education, labour market, immigration, security, public financing and budgeting, administrative reform, performance measurements, governance and others. It attempts to find a balance between description, explanation and evaluation of public policie