Review this journal

Bulletin of the American Society of Papyrologists

SciRev ratings (provided by authors) (based on 1 review)

Duration of manuscript handling phases Click to compare
Duration first review round 5.3 mnths compare →
Total handling time accepted manuscripts 5.3 mnths compare →
Decision time immediate rejection n/a compare →
Characteristics of peer review process Click to compare
Average number of review reports 2.0 compare →
Average number of review rounds 1.0 compare →
Quality of review reports 5.0 compare →
Difficulty of reviewer comments n/a compare →
Overall rating manuscript handling 5.0 (range 0-5) compare →

Latest review Show all reviews

First review round: 23.1 weeks. Overall rating: 5 (excellent). Outcome: Accepted.

Motivation:
In terms of quality of the peer-review, BASP has proven to be the most rigorous journal in my publishing experience. For my lengthy analytical article, I was given two 4-page reports written by clearly the top two authorities in my field. (The reports were anonymous but the level of details into which these two scholars went when reviewing my piece clearly was clearly indicative of who was involved.) The reviewers exhibited clear understanding of the argument as well as the materials under analysis; they spotted numerous content errors and inaccuracies and made positive suggestions, all of which resulted in substantial improvements to the piece.

Show all »

Journal info (provided by editor)

The editor of Bulletin of the American Society of Papyrologists has not yet provided information for this page.

Space for journal cover image
Issues per year
n/a
Articles published last year
n/a
Manuscripts received last year
n/a
% accepted last year
n/a
% immediately rejected last year
n/a
Open access status
n/a
Manuscript handling fee?
n/a
Kind of complaint procedure
n/a
Two-year impact factor
n/a
Five-year impact factor
n/a
Disciplines: History, Archaeology, Literature

Aims and scope

The editor has not yet provided this information.