Welcome to SciRev

Share your experience with the scientific review process and select an efficient journal for submitting your manuscripts.

Search for a journal

Learn more »

If you have recently submitted a manuscript to a scientific journal, please fill out our short questionnaire to let other researchers benefit from your experience. Use this search engine to go to the journal page and press the "review" button.

Search for a scientific discipline

List of all disciplines Learn more »

If you are looking for an efficient journal to submit your manuscript to, use this search engine to go to your scientific field and compare the performance of its journals on duration and quality of the review process and on the way they handle manuscripts.

Journal covers on SciRev

SciRev poll

SciRev news

SciRev article appeared in Scientometrics

Article based on SciRev data has been published in Scientometrics. The paper is available here. Duration of the peer review process takes on average 17 weeks and differs much between scientific fields. Medicine, Public healt…

Read more »

Latest reviews

  1. Journal of Politics
    1st review round: 12.4 wks
    Overall rating: 3 (good)
    Show all »
  2. Clinical Microbiology and Infection
    1st review round: 3.9 wks
    Overall rating: 4 (very good)
    Show all »
  3. Elife
    1st review round: 6.3 wks
    Overall rating: 5 (excellent)
    Show all »
  4. Agronomy for Sustainable Development
    1st review round: 8.7 wks
    Overall rating: 4 (very good)
    Show all »
  5. PLoS Computational Biology
    1st review round: 12.0 wks
    Overall rating: 2 (moderate)
    Show all »
  6. WIREs Water
    1st review round: 7.1 wks
    Overall rating: 0 (very bad)
    Show all »
  7. Frontiers in Neuroinformatics
    1st review round: 5.4 wks
    Overall rating: 3 (good)
    Show all »
  8. FEBS Letters
    1st review round: 2.3 wks
    Overall rating: 4 (very good)
    Show all »
  9. International Journal of Intercultural Relations
    1st review round: 27.1 wks
    Overall rating: 3 (good)
    Show all »
  10. New Phytologist
    1st review round: 26.0 wks
    Overall rating: 1 (bad)
    Show all »
  11. Cognition
    1st review round: 13.1 wks
    Overall rating: 2 (moderate)
    Show all »
  12. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
    1st review round: 5.3 wks
    Overall rating: 3 (good)
    Show all »
  13. Neurocomputing
    1st review round: 12.7 wks
    Overall rating: 5 (excellent)
    Show all »
  14. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica
    1st review round: 1.6 wks
    Overall rating: 5 (excellent)
    Show all »
  15. Physical Review Applied
    1st review round: 8.3 wks
    Overall rating: 5 (excellent)
    Show all »
  16. Physical Review Letters
    1st review round: 1.1 wks
    Overall rating: 5 (excellent)
    Show all »
  17. Physical Review B
    1st review round: 7.9 wks
    Overall rating: 5 (excellent)
    Show all »
  18. Neurology
    1st review round: 5.9 wks
    Overall rating: 4 (very good)
    Show all »
  19. Journal of Biomolecular Structure and Dynamics
    1st review round: 6.6 wks
    Overall rating: 0 (very bad)
    Show all »
  20. Laboratory Phonology
    1st review round: 24.4 wks
    Overall rating: 4 (very good)
    Show all »